John Kerry sold out our Prisoners of War and Missing in Action in favor of Trade Relations with Vietnam. Why?
In retrospect, it is clear that John Kerry had but one goal as Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs. His goal was to remove the issue of Prisoners of War and Missing in Action, as a roadblock to trade and normalization of relations with Vietnam. The question is…. why?
All we need to do is look at two events which occurred shortly after the committee presented its finding, in January 1993.
Francis Zwenig, staff director for the Committee, who was often seen during hearings whispering in Kerry’s ear, became Vice President of the U.S. – Vietnam Trade Council. Ms Zwenig, who helped shaped the conclusion of the committee and its final report was now benefitting financially from the committee’s efforts to close the POW/MIA issue.
In June of 1993, as reported in a Boston Herald article by Michael E. Knell, “Colliers International brokered a $905 million dollar deal to develop a deep sea port in Vietnam..” To skirt the trade embargo still in effect against Vietnam, Colliers International acted through its partner firm Colliers Jardine based in Singapore. At the time the deal was brokered, C. Stewart Forbes was the Chief Executive Officer of Colliers International.
All through 1993 and into early 1994, John Kerry pushed for the lifting of the trade embargo against Vietnam, citing of Vietnamese cooperation on the POW/MIA issue. As evidenced in the articles of Sydney Schanberg and scripted event involving Senator Kerry and Col. Pham Duc Dia, Vietnamese cooperation was clearly a myth.
Yet, Kerry persisted in his campaign to lift the trade embargo. Finally, his efforts were rewarded in February 1994, when President Clinton lifted the embargo.
Did Kerry have an another agenda, beyond the stated goals of the committee? Before you answer that question, there is one other piece of information you need to know. C. Stewart Forbes CEO of Colliers International and John Forbes Kerry are cousins.
Did financial gain motivate Kerry’s actions as Chairman of the Select Committee?
Perhaps someone in the media will ask the question.